1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Duku AI

About

Duku AI builds an autonomous testing platform designed to remove the manual burden of software quality assurance. Its platform deploys AI agents that simulate real customer journeys after every build, catching failures before users encounter them. Rather than requiring teams to write and maintain test scripts, the system self-heals as codebases evolve - eliminating the flaky tests and stale test suites that slow down engineering teams.

The company is led by operators with experience scaling Meta's testing infrastructure, launching Uber's global playbooks, and growing Deliveroo from its early stages to hypergrowth. That background informs both the product's technical architecture and its positioning: giving engineering and product teams the confidence to ship quickly without sacrificing reliability.

Despite being a three-person team, Duku AI has reached $330,000 in revenue in 2025. The company is venture-backed.

Similar companies

Resolve AI logoRA

Resolve AI

Resolve AI builds autonomous AI agents that investigate and resolve production issues and manage on-call operations for engineering teams, aiming to reduce incident resolution time.

Condukt logoCO

Condukt

Condukt provides agentic AI and real-time data infrastructure to automate compliance and business verification for financial institutions.

Weave logoWE

Weave

Weave is an AI-powered engineering analytics platform that helps software teams measure productivity, collaboration, and AI tool impact across their development workflows.

Able logoAB

Able

Able combines human engineering talent with AI tools to accelerate software development, helping organisations improve coding velocity and reduce development cycles.

Arize AI logoAA

Arize AI

Arize AI provides an observability platform that helps AI teams monitor, debug, and improve large language models and autonomous agents in production.

XBOW logoXB

XBOW

XBOW develops an AI-powered platform that autonomously discovers and exploits vulnerabilities 80x faster than manual penetration testing.